4.6 Article

Analytical characterization of complex, biotechnological feedstocks by pH gradient ion exchange chromatography for purification process development

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1311, Issue -, Pages 55-64

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.08.034

Keywords

PH gradient ion exchange chromatography; Downstream process development; Protein purification; Protein identification; Mass spectrometry; Insect cell expression system

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  2. Karlsruhe House of Young Scientists (KHYS)
  3. Diarect AG (Freiburg, Germany)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accelerating growth of the market for proteins and the growing interest in new, more complex molecules are bringing new challenges to the downstream process development of these proteins. This results in a demand for faster, more cost efficient, and highly understood downstream processes. Screening procedures based on high-throughput methods are widely applied nowadays to develop purification processes for proteins. However, screening highly complex biotechnological feedstocks, such as complete cell lysates containing target proteins often expressed with a low titre, is still very challenging. In this work we demonstrate a multidimensional, analytical screening approach based on pH gradient ion exchange chromatography (IEC), gel electrophoresis and protein identification via mass spectrometry to rationally characterize a biotechnological feedstock for the purpose of purification process development. With this very simple characterization strategy a two-step purification based on consecutive IEC operations was rapidly laid out for the purification of a diagnostic protein from a cell lysate reaching a purity of similar to 80%. The target protein was recombinantly produced using an insect cell expression system. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available