4.6 Review

Chemical reactions in liquid-phase microextraction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1216, Issue 4, Pages 701-707

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.10.005

Keywords

Liquid-phase microextraction; Hollow fibers; Chemical reactions; Ion pairing; Complexation; Derivatization; Catalysis

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore (NUS) [R-143-000-303-112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, liquid-phase microextraction (LPME),a microscale implementation of liquid-liquid extraction, has become a very popular sample pretreatment technique because it combines extraction and enrichment, and is inexpensive, easy to operate and nearly solvent-free. Especially so in hollow fiber protected LPME, sample cleanup is also effected. Essentially, owing to its high sample-to-extracting solvent Volume ratio, LPME call achieve high analyte enrichment. Since its advent, the technique has been widely used, and applied to environmental, pharmaceutical. biological and forensic analyses. This review focuses oil developments relating to chemical reactions associated with LPME applications, in contrast to conventional, straightforward extractions in which analytes remain as they are during the extraction process. Chemical reactions brought about during LPME serve to promote the extractability of the analytes (thus expanding the scope of applicability of the technique), facilitate their (analyte) compatibility with the analytical system and/or improve detection sensitivity. The reactions that are usually enabled during LPME include ion-pair extraction (carrier-mediated membrane transport), complexation, chemical (pre-extraction, in situ, and post-extraction) derivatization, phase-transfer catalysis and other special affinity reactions. Strategies on chemical reactions in LPME are overviewed in this report. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available