4.7 Article

On-the-Fly Numerical Surface Integration for Finite-Difference Poisson-Boltzmann Methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages 3608-3619

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct200389p

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH/NIGMS [GM079383, GM093040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most implicit solvation models require the definition of a molecular surface as the interface that separates the solute in atomic detail from the solvent approximated as a continuous medium. Commonly used surface definitions include the solvent accessible surface (SAS), the solvent excluded surface (SES), and the van der Waals surface. In this study, we present an efficient numerical algorithm to compute the SES and SAS areas to facilitate the applications of finite-difference Poisson-Boltzmann methods in biomolecular simulations. Different from previous numerical approaches, our algorithm is physics-inspired and intimately coupled to the finite-difference Poisson-Boltzmann methods to fully take advantage of its existing data structures. Our analysis shows that the algorithm can achieve very good agreement with the analytical method in the calculation of the SES and SAS areas. Specifically, in our comprehensive test of 1555 molecules, the average unsigned relative error is 0.27% in the SES area calculations and 1.05% in the SAS area calculations at a grid spacing of 1/2 angstrom. In addition, a linear correlation analysis was found to improve the accuracy of the coarse-grid SES areas, with the average unsigned relative error reduced to 0.13%. These validation studies indicate that the proposed algorithm can be applied to biomolecules over a broad range of sizes and structures. Finally, the numerical algorithm can also be adapted to evaluate the surface integral of either a vector field or a scalar field defined on the molecular surface for additional solvation energetics and force calculations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available