4.7 Article

Comparative Study of Selected Wave Function and Density Functional Methods for Noncovalent Interaction Energy Calculations Using the Extended S22 Data Set

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages 2365-2376

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct1002253

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [Z40550506]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LC512, MSM6198959216]
  3. Praemium Academiae, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
  4. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation [R32-2008-000-10180-0]
  5. Slovak Grant Agency VEGA [1/0428/09, 1/0520/10]
  6. [MSM 6046137306]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, an extension of the S22 data set of Jurecka et at (Jurecka, P, Sponer, J, Cerny, J; Hobza, P. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2006, 8, 1985), the data set of benchmark CCSD(T)/CBS interaction energies of twenty-two noncovalent complexes in equilibrium geometries, is presented The S22 data set has been extended by including the stretched (one shortened and three elongated) complex geometries of the S22 data set along the main noncovalent interaction coordinate The goal of this work is to assess the accuracy of the popular wave function methods (MP2-, MP3- and, CCSD-based) and density functional methods (with and without empirical correction for the dispersion energy) for noncovalent complexes based on a statistical evaluation not only in equilibrium, but also in nonequilibrium geometries The results obtained in this work provide information on whether an accurate and balanced description of the different interaction types and complex geometry distortions can be expected from the tested methods This information has an important implication in the calculation of large molecular complexes, where the number of distant interacting molecular fragments, often in far from equilibrium geometries, increases rapidly with the system size The best performing WFT methods were found to be the SCS-CCSD (spin-component scaled CCSD, according to Takatani, T, Hohenstein, E. G., Sherrill, C D J Chem. Phys 2008, 128, 124111), MP2C (dispersion-corrected MP2, according to Hesselmann, A J Chem. Phys 2008, 128, 144112), and MP2 5 (scaled MP3, according to Pitonak, M., Neogrady, P., Cerny, J; Grimme, S., Hobza, P. ChemPhysChem 2009, 10, 282.) Since none of the OFT methods fulfilled the required statistical criteria proposed in this work, they cannot be generally recommended for large-scale calculations The DFT methods still have the potential to deliver accurate results for large molecules, but most likely on the basis of an error cancellation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available