4.7 Article

A Subsystem TDDFT Approach for Solvent Screening Effects on Excitation Energy Transfer Couplings

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 1843-1851

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct100138k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [700.59.422]
  2. Stichting Nationale Computer Faciliteiten (NCF)
  3. Comissionat per a Universitats i Recerca of the Departament d'Innovacio, Universitats i Empresa of the Generalitat de Catalunya [2008BPB00108]
  4. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [2008-2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a QM/QM approach for the calculation of solvent screening effects on excitation-energy transfer (EET) couplings. The method employs a subsystem time-dependent density-functional theory formalism [J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 134116] and explicitly includes solvent excited states to account for the environmental response. It is investigated how the efficiency of these calculations can be enhanced in order to treat systems with very large solvation shells while fully including the environmental response. In particular, we introduce a criterion to select solvent excited states according to their approximate contribution weight to the environmental polarization. As a model system, we investigate the perylene diimide dimer in a water cluster in comparison to a recent polarizable QM/MM method for EET couplings in the condensed phase [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 1838]. A good overall agreement in the description of the solvent screening is found. Deviations can be observed for the effect of the closest water molecules, whereas the screening introduced by outer solvation shells is very similar in both methods. Our results can thus be helpful to determine at which distance from a chromophore environmental response effects may safely be approximated by classical models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available