4.6 Article

γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentration inversely correlates with basal perfusion in human occipital lobe

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 532-541

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.231

Keywords

arterial spin labeling; fMRI; GABA; inhibition

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NIH/NINDS 5R01N5078828-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Commonly used neuroimaging approaches in humans exploit hemodynamic or metabolic indicators of brain function. However, fundamental gaps remain in our ability to relate such henno-metabolic reactivity to neurotransmission, with recent reports providing paradoxical information regarding the relationship among basal perfusion, functional imaging contrast, and neurotransmission in awake humans. Here, sequential magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) measurements of the primary Inhibitory neurotransmitter, y-aminobutyric add (GABA + macromolecules normalized by the complex N-acetyl aspartate-N-acetyl aspartyl glutamic add: [GABA]/[NAA NAAG]), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements of perfusion, fractional gray-matter volume, and arterial arrival time (AAT) are recorded in human visual cortex from a controlled cohort of young adult male volunteers with neurocognitive battery-confirmed comparable cognitive capacity (3T; n=16; age= 23 +/- 3 years). Regression analyses reveal an inverse correlation between [GABA+1/[NAA NAAGj and perfusion (R= 0.46; P=0.037), yet no relationship between MT and [GABA(+)NNAA NAAG1 (R= 0.12; P=0.33). Perfusion measurements that do not control for AAT variations reveal reduced correlations between [GABA(+)]/{NAA NAAG1 and perfusion (R= 0.13; P=0.32). These findings largely reconcile contradictory reports between perfusion and inhibitory tone, and underscore the physiologic origins of the growing literature relating functional imaging signals, hemodynamics, and neurotransmission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available