4.7 Article

Expression of GFAT1 and OGT in Podocytes: Transport of Glucosamine and the Implications for Glucose Uptake into These Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 225, Issue 2, Pages 577-584

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.22242

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [PBZ-MNiSW/07/2006/24, N N401 228434, N N401 024035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase (GFAT) and N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (OGT) participate in glucosamine (GlcN) production and its utilization in O-glycosylation, one of key post-translational modifications of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins. For this purpose, cells require a high rate of intracellular production of GlcN and/or significant GlcN delivery. We studied the expression of GFAT1 and OGT and measured uptake of glucose and GlcN in cultured rat podocytes, the main cellular component of glomerular filtration barrier. RT-PCR revealed the presence of both GFAT1 and OGT mRNA. Immunofluorescence of GFAT1 has shown staining signal diffused within the cytoplasm of the cell body and processes. However, OGT was distinctly visible around the nucleus and, in diffuse form, within the cytoplasm of cell bodies and processes. Glucose was transported (1.3 +/- 0.2 nmol/min/mg protein) mainly by facilitative transporter systems whilst GlcN uptake (1.1 +/- 0.2 nmol/min/mg protein) in a significant part, involved a sodium-dependent transporter. There was interplay between glucose and GlcN uptake. In the presence of GlcN (50 mu M), the rate of glucose uptake decreased by about 50%. The rate of GlcN uptake decreased by 28% in the presence of 5.6 mM glucose. Our results suggest that cultured podocytes possess limited ability to synthesize GlcN internally and therefore may need to receive GlcN from the extracellular environment. J. Cell. Physiol. 225: 577-584, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available