4.6 Article

Suppressive Effect of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (SAHA) on Hepatitis C Virus Replication

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 114, Issue 9, Pages 1987-1996

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.24541

Keywords

SUBEROYLANILIDE HYDROXAMIC ACID; HEPATITIS C VIRUS; OR6; MIR-122; OSTEOPONTIN; APOLIPOPROTEIN-A1

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  2. Keio Gijuku Academic Development Fund
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Inaida Foundation
  5. [23680090]
  6. [24590993]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25293110, 23590551, 23680090] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) has a clinical promise for treatment of cancer including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To investigate effect of SAHA on hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication, we treated the HCV replicon cell OR6 with SAHA. HCV replication was significantly inhibited by SAHA at concentrations below 1M with no cellular toxicity. Another HDAC inhibitor, tricostatin A, also showed reduction of HCV replication. The microarray analysis and quantitative RT-PCR demonstrated up-regulation of osteopontin (OPN) and down-regulation of apolipoprotein-A1 (Apo-A1) after SAHA treatment. Direct gene induction of OPN and knockdown of Apo-A1 also showed reduction of HCV replication. The liver specific microRNA-122, which is involved in HCV replication, was not affected by SAHA treatment. These results suggest that SAHA has suppressive effect on HCV replication through alterations of gene expression such as OPN and Apo-A1 in host cells. Epigenetic treatment with HDAC inhibitors may be a novel therapeutic approach for diseases associated with HCV infection such as chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and HCC. J. Cell. Biochem. 114: 1987-1996, 2013. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available