4.6 Article

FGF8 Regulates Myogenesis and Induces Runx2 Expression and Osteoblast Differentiation in Cultured Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages 546-552

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.22012

Keywords

FGF8; MYOD; MYOGENIN; RUNX2; FOXC2; HAND1; DIFFERENTIATION

Funding

  1. Dental Research Center, Nihon University School of Dentistry
  2. Sato Fund, Nihon University School of Dentistry
  3. Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan
  4. Nihon University Research Grant for Assistants and Young Researchers (2007)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the current study, treatment of the rat osteogenic cell line ROB-C26 cells with fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8) stimulated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and also induced the expression of the Runx2 transcription factor, and increased the activity of a luciferase reporter gene containing the osteocalcin (OCN) promoter and six copies of the osteoblast specific cis-acting element 2 (OSE2) response element. In contrast, FGF8 treatment of the mouse myoblast cell line C2C12 inhibited the expression of desmin and the synthesis of myotubes. The expression of MyoD, Myogenin, Foxc2, and Hand1 was also decreased by FGF8. Transient expression of Foxc2 in C2C12 cells induced the expression of Hand1, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis indicated that Foxc2 binds to the promoter region of the Hand1 gene. These results indicated that Foxc2 is directly involved in the regulation of Hand1 expression. The results of the current study indicate that FGF8 regulates myoblast differentiation through the regulation of MyoD expression, and that this regulation is independent of Hand1 in cultured cells. Conversely, FGF8 supports bone development and cell differentiation though the induction of Runx2 expression. J. Cell. Biochem. 106: 546-552, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available