4.4 Article

Long-lasting Hypotensive Effect in Renal Hypertensive Rats Induced by Nitric Oxide Released From a Ruthenium Complex

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 193-198

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31825bacc4

Keywords

nitric oxide donor; renal hypertension; hypotensive effect; superoxide scavenger; NO synthase

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated the effect of the ruthenium complex [Ru(terpy)(bdq)NO+](3+) (TERPY) on the arterial pressure from renal hypertensive 2 kidney-1 clip (2K-1C) rats, which was compared with sodium nitroprusside (SNP). The most interesting finding was that the intravenous bolus injection of TERPY (2.5, 5.0, 7 mg/kg) had a dose-dependent hypotensive effect only in 2K-1C rats. On the other hand, SNP (35 and 70 mu g/kg) presented a similar hypotensive effect in both normotensive (2K) and 2K-1C although the effect of 70 mu g/kg was >35 mu g/kg. The injection of the nonselective NO-synthase inhibitor N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) increased the arterial pressure in 2K and 2K-1C rats with a similar magnitude. After infusion of L-NAME, the hypotensive effect induced by TERPY and SNP was potentiated in both 2K and in 2K-1C rats. The administration of the superoxide scavenger 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxyl increased the hypotensive effect induced by TERPY or SNP in both 2K and 2K-1C rats. The hypotensive effect induced by TERPY was longer than that produced by SNP. Taken together, our results show that the TERPY has a long-lasting hypotensive effect, which has a dose dependence and higher magnitude in 2K-1C compared with in 2K rats. In comparison with SNP, TERPY is less potent in inducing arterial pressure fall, but it presents a much longer hypotensive effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available