4.3 Article

Effects of treatment with once-daily nifedipine CR and twice-daily benidipine on prevention of symptomatic attacks in patients with coronary spastic angina pectoris-Adalat Trial vs Coniel in Tokyo against Coronary Spastic Angina (ATTACK CSA)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages 238-247

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2009.11.005

Keywords

Nifedipine CR; Benidipine; Calcium-channel blockers; Coronary spastic angina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We compared the efficacy of once-daily treatment with nifedipine CR 40 mg (NR) and twice-daily treatment with benidipine 4 mg (BD) in patients with coronary spastic angina (CSA) registered in 3 cardiovascular institutes in Tokyo. Methods and results: CSA was diagnosed by an ischemic ST change during Hotter ECG monitoring or drug-induced test. Thirty patients were randomly allocated to either NR or BD group. The number of symptomatic attacks and the total frequency of short-acting nitrates were examined based on the data in diaries written by patients. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The median number (25-75% quartile) of attacks per week was significantly decreased in NR group, i.e., 1.0 (0.8-2.0) at baseline, 0.0 (0.0-1.0) after 4 weeks of treatment, and 0.0 (0.0-0.0) after 8 weeks of treatment (P=0 0093, P=0.0002, Wilcoxon's rank-sum test). No significant decrease was observed in BD, i.e. 1.0 (0.5-2 0) at baseline, 1.3 (0.0-3 0) after 4 weeks, and 0.0 (0.0-1.0) after 8 weeks. The number of attacks was fewer in NR than in BD group (P=0.074. P=0.015, U-test for difference) Conclusion: Once-daily treatment with NR 40 mg was more effective than twice-daily treatment with BD in the prevention of CSA attacks. (C) 2009 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available