4.6 Article

Change in platelet levels during radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for the treatment of glioblastoma: a novel prognostic factor for survival

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 138, Issue 10, Pages 1683-1688

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-012-1243-x

Keywords

Glioblastoma; Temozolomide; Platelets; Survival; Prognosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (RCAT) is now standard treatment for grade IV glioblastoma (GBM). We report the results from our 7 years experience of using RCAT, and the potential role of a change in platelet count as a prognostic factor. We identified all patients with biopsy-proven GBM who received RCAT at the Royal Free Hospital between 2002 and 2009. We extracted data on demographic, tumour and treatment variables and overall survival and conducted univariate analyses on the association of the baseline factors with survival, and included those that were significant in a multivariate model. We then conducted exploratory analyses on the impact of changes in haematological parameters and overall survival. A total of eighty-four patients were included in the final analysis. Median overall survival in our study was 17.6 months. Overall survival rate at 1 year and 2 years were 70 and 36 %, respectively. Platelet counts were seen to fall when measured from baseline to beginning of week 6. A decrease in platelet count from baseline to week 6 was associated with longer survival (p = 0.006), and this remains significant when adjusted for known prognostic factors. Our study shows the survival benefit seen in the phase III trial is reproducible in clinical practice. In addition, decreased platelet count during concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide appears to correlate with prolonged survival, a finding that warrants further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available