4.5 Article

DNA methylation contributes to loss in productivity of monoclonal antibody-producing CHO cell lines

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 147, Issue 3-4, Pages 180-185

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.04.004

Keywords

Stability; DNA methylation; Gene silencing; Monoclonal antibody; CHO cells

Funding

  1. Biomedical Research Council/Science and Engineering Research Council of A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research), Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Production instability currently limits the use of mammalian cells for industrial production of therapeutic proteins. We have previously reported that the loss of productivity in recombinant monoclonal antibody producing Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO-mAb) cell lines is mainly due to a decrease in heavy chain (HC) and light chain (LC) transcripts. Molecular analysis indicates that the decreased mRNA levels are not due to a loss in gene copies and change of integration sites. In this work, we further demonstrate that impaired trans-acting factors and spontaneous mutations to the DNA are not responsible for the reduced HC and LC transcription. Examination of two CpG sites by methyl-assisted quantitative real-time PCR assay revealed an increase in methylation of the human cytomegalovirus major immediate-early enhancer and promoter (hCMV-MIE) controlling the expression of LC and HC in cells which exhibited loss in productivity. Treatment of these cells with a DNA methylation inhibitor, 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine, partially restored the lost specific mAb productivity. The increase in productivity correlated to the increase in mRNA levels of HC and LC and the demethylation of hCMV-MIE promoter. This finding, which indicates that DNA methylation contributes to production instability, will be beneficial for generation of high-producing cell lines with stable productivity. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available