4.7 Article

Levinthal's question revisited, and answered

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 113-124

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2012.674286

Keywords

protein folding; hydrophobic; hydrophilic effects; hydrophilic forces; Anfinsen's hypothesis; Levinthal's question

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Attempts to answer the Levinthal question How proteins fold to give such a unique structure are discussed. In the first part of this article, we focus on a few reasons as to why the solution to the protein-folding problem (PFP) has been elusive for a very long time. One is a result of the misinterpretation of Anfinsen's Thermodynamic hypothesis which led to the conclusion that the native structure of a protein must be at a global minimum of the Gibbs energy. The second is the result of the adherence to the hydrophobic paradigm, and at the same time ignoring a whole repertoire of hydrophilic effects. It is argued that switching from a target-based to a caused-based approach, and adopting the hydrophilic paradigm leads straightforwardly to a simple answer to Levinthal's question, as well as to a solution of the PFP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available