4.5 Article

Different doses of low-level laser irradiation modulate the in vitro response of osteoblast-like cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.10.108002

Keywords

biophysical stimulation; bone remodeling; diode laser; in vitro study; osteoblast-like cells

Funding

  1. Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute (Ricerca Corrente)
  2. Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute-RIT [POR-FESR 2007-2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because osteoblasts play a key role in bone remodeling and the influence of low-level laser therapy on this process is not clear, Saos-2 human osteoblast-like cells were irradiated by a gallium-aluminum-arsenide diode laser (915 nm) for 10, 48, 96, 193, and 482 s using doses 1, 5, 10, 20, and 50 J/cm(2), respectively. A control group was not irradiated. Morphology, viability, and cytotoxicity analyses were carried out after 1 hr, 1 day, and 3 days. Deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) content and release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), and osteoprotegerin (OPG) were evaluated. Viability was modulated by laser irradiation in a dose-dependent manner, with 10 J/cm(2) inducing a biostimulatory response and 20 to 50 J/cm(2) determining a bioinhibitory and cytotoxic effect. Accordingly, DNA content was generally increased for the 10 J/cm(2) dose and decreased for the 50 J/cm(2) dose. A rapid and transitory trend toward increased RANKL/OPG ratio and a tendency toward a delayed increase in VEGF release for doses of 1 to 10 J/cm(2) was found. Further investigations using the biostimulatory dose of 10 J/cm(2) emerged from this study are needed to establish the ideal treatment regimens in the laboratory as well as in clinical practice. (C) 2014 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available