4.5 Article

Spectral areas and ratios classifier algorithm for pancreatic tissue classification using optical spectroscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.3314900

Keywords

spectroscopy; fluorescence; reflectance; tissues; pancreas; carcinoma

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA-114542]
  2. National Pancreas Foundation
  3. Wallace H. Coulter Foundation
  4. University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
  5. University of Michigan Medical School
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA114542] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer death, in part because of the inability of current diagnostic methods to reliably detect early-stage disease. We present the first assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of algorithms developed for pancreatic tissue classification using data from fiber optic probe-based bimodal optical spectroscopy, a real-time approach that would be compatible with minimally invasive diagnostic procedures for early cancer detection in the pancreas. A total of 96 fluorescence and 96 reflectance spectra are considered from 50 freshly excised tissue sites-including human pancreatic adenocarcinoma, chronic pancreatitis (inflammation), and normal tissues-on nine patients. Classification algorithms using linear discriminant analysis are developed to distinguish among tissues, and leave-one-out cross-validation is employed to assess the classifiers' performance. The spectral areas and ratios classifier (SpARC) algorithm employs a combination of reflectance and fluorescence data and has the best performance, with sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value for correctly identifying adenocarcinoma being 85, 89, 92, and 80%, respectively. (C) 2010 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. [DOI: 10.1117/1.3314900]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available