4.5 Article

The roles of monocytic heat shock protein 60 and Toll-like receptors in the regional inflammation response to wear debris particles

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 92A, Issue 4, Pages 1373-1381

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32474

Keywords

wear debris; heat-shock protein 60; TLR4; cytokines; aseptic loosening

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biological response to orthopaedic wear debris is central to peri-prosthetic tissue inflammation and osteolysis, through mechanisms that include local inflammatory cytokine production. In particular, interleukin-1 beta (1L-1 beta) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha 1) are generated in high quantities following monocyte accumulation in periprosthetic inflammatory tissue, and these cytokine combine with other inflammatory mediators to trigger osteolysis. Since the precise mechanisms involved in debris-associated inflammation remain unclear, it is important to understand how wear debris particles initially interact with inflammatory cells. We have previously demonstrated that the severity of the inflammation response is influenced by the size, shape, and quantity of particles accumulated in tissues. The current in vitro and in vivo results indicate that heat-shock protein (Hsp) expression is elevated when monocytes are exposed to wear debris particles. We have also addressed the mechanisms by which heat-shock protein 60 (Hsp60) positively modulates inflammatory cytokines via Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) signal transduction pathway on mononuclear cells. Furthermore, down-regulation of TLR4 expression using antisense oligonucleotides targeted to TLR4 mRNA suppressed cytokine production in both exogenous Hsp60 and particles stimulated cultures. Collectively, these data indicate that monocytic Hsp60 is an additional inducible immunoregulatory mediator in response to particle-induced cell stress. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 92A: 1373-1381, 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available