4.6 Editorial Material

Technical desiderata for the integration of genomic data with clinical decision support

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 3-7

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.05.014

Keywords

Clinical decision support systems; Medical genetics; Genomics; Electronic health records; Health information technology; Personalized medicine

Funding

  1. AHRQ HHS [K01HS01835] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCATS NIH HHS [8UL1TR000105] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHGRI NIH HHS [5R01HG004341] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ease with which whole genome sequence (WGS) information can be obtained is rapidly approaching the point where it can become useful for routine clinical care. However, significant barriers will inhibit widespread adoption unless clinicians are able to effectively integrate this information into patient care and decision-making. Electronic health records (EHR) and clinical decision support (CDS) systems may play a critical role in this integration. A previously published technical desiderata focused primarily on the integration of genomic data into the EHR. This manuscript extends the previous desiderata by specifically addressing needs related to the integration of genomic information with CDS. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a guiding set of technical desiderata for supporting the clinical use of WGS through CDS. A panel of domain experts in genomics and CDS developed a proposed set of seven additional requirements. These desiderata were reviewed by 63 experts in genomics and CDS through an online survey and refined based on the experts' comments. These additional desiderata provide important guiding principles for the technical development of CDS capabilities for the clinical use of WGS information. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available