4.4 Article

First step toward the fingerprinting of brain tumors based on synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence and multiple discriminant analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages 1217-1226

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00775-011-0810-y

Keywords

Synchrotron radiation; X-ray fluorescence; Brain tumors; Discriminant analysis; Trace elements

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and High Education, Warsaw, Poland [DESY/304/2006, N N518 377537]
  2. European Community [226716]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synchrotron-radiation-based X-ray fluorescence was applied to the elemental microimaging of neoplastic tissues in cases of various types of brain tumors. The following cases were studied: glioblastoma multiforme, gemistocytic astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma, ganglioglioma, fibrillary astrocytoma, and atypical transitional meningioma. Apart from neoplastic tissue, the analysis included areas of tissue apparently without malignant infiltration. The masses per unit area of P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Fe, Cu, Zn, Br, and Rb were used to construct a diagnostic classifier for brain tumors using multiple discriminant analysis. It was found that S, Cl, Cu, Fe, K, Br, and Zn are the most significant elements in the general discrimination of tumor type. The highest similarity in elemental composition was between atypical transitional meningioma and fibrillary astrocytoma. The smallest differentiation was between glioblastoma multiforme and oligodendroglioma. The mean percentage of correct classifications, estimated according to the a posteriori probabilities procedure, was 99.9%, whereas the mean prediction ability of 87.6% was achieved for ten new cases excluded previously from the model construction. The results showed that multiple discriminant analysis based on elemental composition of tissue may be a potentially valuable method assisting differentiation and/or classification of brain tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available