4.6 Article

Decoupling the Role of Ubiquitination for the Dislocation Versus Degradation of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class I Proteins during Endoplasmic Reticulum-associated Degradation (ERAD)

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 288, Issue 32, Pages 23295-23306

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.482018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI019687]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aberrantly or excessively expressed proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum are identified by quality control mechanisms and dislocated to the cytosol for proteasome-mediated, ubiquitin-dependent degradation by a process termed endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD). In addition to its role in degradation, ubiquitination has also been implicated in substrate dislocation, although whether direct ubiquitin conjugation of ERAD substrates is required for dislocation has been difficult to ascertain. An obstacle in probing the mechanism of quality control-induced ERAD is the paucity of ERAD substrates being dislocated and detected at any given time. To obviate this problem, we report here the use of a sensitive biotinylation system to probe the dislocation of major histocompatibility complex I (MHCI) heavy chain substrates in the absence of immune evasion proteins. Using this assay system the dislocation of MHCI heavy chains was found not to require potential ubiquitin conjugation sites in the cytoplasmic tail or Lys residues in the ectodomain. By contrast, dislocation of MHCI heavy chains did require deubiquitinating enzyme activity and rapid proteasome-mediated degradation required Lys residues in MHCI heavy chain ectodomain. These combined findings support the model that the endoplasmic reticulum quality control-induced dislocation of MHCI heavy chains may not require direct ubiquitination/deubiquitination as is required for proteasome-mediated degradation post dislocation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available