4.6 Article

The Heat Shock Response Is Modulated by and Interferes with Toxic Effects of Scrapie Prion Protein and Amyloid β

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 287, Issue 52, Pages 43765-43776

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.389007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 596, GRK1123, SFB 740]
  2. Max Planck Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The heat shock response (HSR) is an evolutionarily conserved pathway designed to maintain proteostasis and to ameliorate toxic effects of aberrant protein folding. We have studied the modulation of the HSR by the scrapie prion protein (PrPSc) and amyloid beta peptide (A beta) and investigated whether an activated HSR or the ectopic expression of individual chaperones can interfere with PrPSc- or A beta-induced toxicity. First, we observed different effects on the HSR under acute or chronic exposure of cells to PrPSc or A beta. In chronically exposed cells the threshold to mount a stress response was significantly increased, evidenced by a decreased expression of Hsp72 after stress, whereas an acute exposure lowered the threshold for stress-induced expression of Hsp72. Next, we employed models of PrPSc- and A beta-induced toxicity to demonstrate that the induction of the HSR ameliorates the toxic effects of both PrPSc and A beta. Similarly, the ectopic expression of cytosolic Hsp72 or the extracellular chaperone clusterin protected against PrPSc- or A beta-induced toxicity. However, toxic signaling induced by a pathogenic PrP mutant located at the plasma membrane was prevented by an activated HSR or Hsp72 but not by clusterin, indicating a distinct mode of action of this extracellular chaperone. Our study supports the notion that different pathological protein conformers mediate toxic effects via similar cellular pathways and emphasizes the possibility to exploit the heat shock response therapeutically.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available