4.6 Article

Lipid Phenotype of Two Distinct Subpopulations of Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Tokyo 172 Substrain

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 286, Issue 51, Pages 44153-44161

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.310037

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan
  2. Japan Health Sciences Foundation, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22591105] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Tokyo 172 is a predominant World Health Organization Reference Reagent for the BCG vaccine. Recently, the BCG Tokyo 172 substrain was reported to consist of two subpopulations with different colony morphologies, smooth and rough. Smooth colonies had a characteristic 22-bp deletion in Rv3405c of the region of difference (RD) 16 (type I), and rough colonies were complete in this region (type II). We hypothesized that the morphological difference is related to lipid phenotype and affects their antigenicity. We determined the lipid compositions and biosynthesis of types I and II. Scanning electron microscopy showed that type I was 1.5 times longer than type II. Phenolic glycolipid (PGL) and phthiocerol dimycocerosate (PDIM) were found only in type I. Although it has been reported that the RD16 is involved in the expression of PGL, type II did not possess PGL/PDIM. We examined the ppsA-E gene responsible for PGL/PDIM biosynthesis and found that the existence of PGL/PDIM in types I and II is caused by a ppsA gene mutation not regulated by the RD16. PGL suppressed the host recognition of total lipids via Toll-like receptor 2, and this suggests that PGL is antigenic and involved in host responses, acting as a cell wall component. This is the first report to show the difference between lipid phenotypes of types I and II. It is important to clarify the heterogeneity of BCG vaccine substrains to discuss and evaluate the quality, safety, and efficacy of the BCG vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available