4.3 Article

A Randomized, Single-Blind, Substitution Study of OROS Methylphenidate (Concerta) in ADHD Adults Receiving Immediate Release Methylphenidate

Journal

JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 286-294

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1087054710367880

Keywords

ADHD; adult; clinical trial; methylphenidate

Funding

  1. McNeil Pediatrics
  2. Shire Laboratories, Inc.
  3. Eli Lilly Company
  4. Glaxo-Smith Kline
  5. Janssen Pharmaceutical
  6. McNeil Pharmaceutical
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  8. Cephalon
  9. Pfizer
  10. National Institute of Mental Health
  11. Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs
  12. Shire Pharmaceuticals
  13. Abbott
  14. Eli Lilly
  15. Forest
  16. McNeil
  17. Shire
  18. Elminda Ltd
  19. Bristol Myers Squibb
  20. Johnson Johnson
  21. Merck
  22. New River
  23. Organon
  24. Takeda
  25. Alza
  26. AstraZeneca
  27. Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  28. Otsuka
  29. NICHD
  30. Fundacion Areces
  31. Medice Pharmaceuticals
  32. Spanish Child Psychiatry Association
  33. Celltech
  34. Esai
  35. Glaxo
  36. Gliatech
  37. Janssen
  38. NARSAD
  39. NIDA
  40. Noven
  41. Neurosearch
  42. Pharmacia
  43. Prechter Foundation
  44. Stanley Foundation
  45. UCB Pharma, Inc.
  46. Wyeth
  47. ElMinda
  48. Hilda and Preston Davis Foundation
  49. National Institutes of Health
  50. Janssen-Ortho
  51. MGH Academy/Reed Medical Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The main aim of this study was to examine the efficacy, tolerability, and compliance of an extended-release formulation of methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) in adults with ADHD receiving immediate-release methylphenidate (IR-MPH). Method: Participants were outpatient adults with ADHD who were stable on IR-MPH-administered TID. Participants were randomized (4:1) to equipotent doses of OROS-MPH or to continue IR-MPH and were assessed weekly for 6 weeks with the Adult ADHD Investigator System Symptom Report Scale (AISRS). Results: Randomization of 53 IR-MPH responders to IR- or OROS-MPH had no effect on AISRS score at endpoint (11.2 +/- 6.9 vs. 10.7 +/- 5.1, p = .8). Participants stabilized on IR-MPH and switched to OROS-MPH remained satisfied over 71% of the time. However, the IR-MPH group missed more doses (7.3 +/- 6.8 vs. 3.3 +/- 4.2, p = .02) than the OROS-MPH group. Conclusion: Findings showed that adults with ADHD can be successfully switched from an effective regimen of IR-MPH TID to once-daily OROS-MPH. Results also demonstrated better compliance with OROS-MPH than with IR-MPH treatment. (J. of Att. Dis. 2011; 15(4) 286-294)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available