4.2 Article

Happy Air®, a Successful School-Based Asthma Educational and Interventional Program for Primary School Children

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASTHMA
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 419-426

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2011.563808

Keywords

asthma management; pediatric asthma; quality of life; school-based program

Funding

  1. Advanced Pediatric Allergy and Immunology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. To investigate whether an active partnership between schools, parents, and pediatricians can improve the management of asthma and quality of life of children with asthma. Methods. A comprehensive asthma program (Happy Air (R)), based on a strong family-physician-school relationship, was carried out over a period of 3 years in six primary schools (2765 children). This program provides educational intervention to families, school staff, and students, as well as the administration of written questionnaires to identify children with asthma, asthma diagnosis and management, and, last but not least, extracurricular activities to improve respiratory and psychological conditions. Quality of life of children and parents, at the beginning and end of the program, was assessed using PedsQL (TM) 4.0 (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory) measurement model. Result. Asthma was diagnosed in 135 children, of which 37 (27%) were diagnosed de novo. In all children, both single item and total clinical asthma scores showed a significant increase (p < .001) at the end of the Happy Air (R) program. The average scores of both the total PedsQL (TM) 4.0 and the four Scales were significantly increased (p < .001). Conclusion. Happy Air (R) is a model for a strategy of education-and school-based intervention for children with asthma and their families. This multi-action program for diagnosis, clinical follow-up, education, self-management, and quality-of-life control aims to minimize the socioeconomic burden of asthma disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available