4.5 Article

Do pasture user groups lead to improved rangeland condition in the Mongolian Gobi Desert?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 37-46

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.02.009

Keywords

Collective action; Common property; Degradation; Herder groups; Institutions; Variability

Funding

  1. Australian Rangeland Society
  2. Desert Knowledge CRC
  3. Northern Territory Research and Innovation Board
  4. South Australian Royal Geographical Society
  5. University of Queensland
  6. CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences
  7. Mongolian Society for Rangeland Management
  8. MercyCorps Mongolia
  9. Endeavour Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pasture user groups have become an important tool by which development agencies have sought to improve rangeland condition and resolve inter-herder conflict. However the ability of these groups to improve rangeland condition in the Gobi Desert is rarely examined. In this paper, three and twelve year old pasture user group areas were compared with non-group areas. Herders and local officials in both group and non-group areas were interviewed to compare activities and institutions that may contribute to degradation through overgrazing. Soil and vegetation based indicators of rangeland condition were also assessed. There were some differences in indicators of rangeland condition between pasture user group and non-group areas, but little evidence of institutions or activities specific to the group that could explain this difference. Herders did not seek to manage grazing pressures for natural resource management aims, nor did they enforce or sanction the external spatial boundaries of pasture user groups. These results suggest that the ability of pasture user group to improve rangeland condition in the Mongolian Gobi Desert may have been overstated. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available