4.4 Article

Performance evaluation of propensity score methods for estimating average treatment effects with multi-level treatments*

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 853-873

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2018.1523375

Keywords

Generalized propensity score; multi-level treatment; maternal antidepressant

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIH) [RC4MH092755, R03MH088902, K24AI77930, R21HL123829, R21HL129020]
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [R01HS022093]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The propensity score (PS) method is widely used to estimate the average treatment effect (TE) in observational studies. However, it is generally confined to the binary treatment assignment. In an extension to the settings of a multi-level treatment, Imbens proposed a generalized propensity score which is the conditional probability of receiving a particular level of the treatment given pre-treatment variables. The average TE can then be estimated by conditioning solely on the generalized PS under the assumption of weak unconfoundedness. In the present work, we adopted this approach and conducted extensive simulations to evaluate the performance of several methods using the generalized PS, including subclassification, matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and covariate adjustment. Compared with other methods, IPTW had the preferred overall performance. We then applied these methods to a retrospective cohort study of 228,876 pregnant women. The impact of the exposure to different types of the antidepressant medications (no exposure, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) only, non-SSRI only, and both) during pregnancy on several important infant outcomes (birth weight, gestation age, preterm labor, and respiratory distress) were assessed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available