4.3 Article

Use of a vegetation index model to estimate gross primary production in open grassland

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.6.063532

Keywords

gross primary production; grassland; light use efficiency; moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer; vegetation index

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41001210]
  2. Knowledge Innovation Program of CAS [KZCX2-EW-QN302]
  3. Special Foundation for Young Scientists of IRSA [Y0S04800KB]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observations from satellite remote sensing provide important tools for regional and global monitoring of terrestrial ecosystems. This article evaluated a recently developed vegetation index (VI) model that estimates gross primary production (GPP) in an open grassland using flux measurements and 250-m moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) images. Two VIs, the two-band enhanced vegetation index (EVI2) and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), were tested as indicators of both fraction of absorbed photosynthetic active radiation (f(APAR)) and light use efficiency (LUE). The standard MODIS GPP product was moderately correlated with flux-measured GPP as indicated by the coefficients of determination (R-2) of 0.56 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 15.4 g C m(-2) 8d(-1). In comparison, results suggested that the VI model can provide improved estimates of GPP, with R-2 of 0.80, 0.82, and 0.81 for EVI2 x EVI2 x photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), NDVI x EVI2 x PAR, and NDVI x NDVI x PAR, respectively. The underlying reason was that both EVI2 and NDVI were potential proxies of f(APAR) (R-2 of 0.43 and 0.53, respectively) and LUE (R-2 of 0.52 and 0.46, respectively). The primary analysis will be helpful for spatial improvements of future GPP models. (C) 2012 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). [DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.6.063532]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available