4.6 Article

Smoke and toxicity suppression by zinc salts in flame-retardant polyurethane-polyisocyanurate foams filled with phosphonate and chlorinated phosphate

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 132, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.41846

Keywords

addition polymerization; flame retardance; foams; polyurethanes; thermal properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three types of zinc salts, ZnAl2O4, ZnFe2O4, and Zn2SiO4, were prepared by coprecipitation. Potential smoke and toxicity suppression by zinc salts in flame-retardant polyurethane-polyisocyanurate foams (FPUR-PIR) with dimethylmethylphosphonate (DMMP) and tris (2-chloropropyl) phosphate (TCPP) were investigated. The crystal structure and dispersity of zinc salts in FPUR-PIR were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Smoke density, flame retardancy, and thermal degradation were studied using smoke density rating (SDR), limiting oxygen index (LOI), the cone calorimeter test, and thermogravimetry coupled with FTIR spectrophotometry (TGA-FTIR). The results indicated that pure zinc salts were obtained and evenly dispersed on the cell wall of FPUR-PIR. SDR and the specific extinction area (SEA) were significantly decreased, the time to second heat release rate peak (pk-HRR) of FRUP-PIR was delayed after incorporation of the zinc salts; zinc salts partially inhibited phosphorus oxide release into the gas phase, enhanced the condensed phase effect of phosphorus, reduced, and prolonged the release of isocyanate compound and hydrogen cyanide from FRUP-PIR; due to an increase in the amount of char residues, which indicated the suppression of smoke and toxicity volatiles. ZnFe2O4 resulted in better char formation at the initial degradation stage of FPUR-PIR, and ZnAl2O4 retained more phosphorus in the solid phase at higher temperature. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available