4.6 Article

The Role of Two Different Internal Donors (Phthalate and 1,3-Diether) on the Formation of Surface Structure in MgCl2-Supported Ziegler-Natta Catalysts and Their Catalytic Performance of Propylene Polymerization

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 131, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/app.40536

Keywords

catalysts; polyolefins; properties and characterization

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2012R1A1A2000922]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A1A2000922] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of two different internal donors [a phthalate (diisobutylphthalate) and a 1,3-diether (2,2-diisobutyl-1,3-dimethoxypropane)] on the formation of surface structure in MgCl2-supported Ziegler-Natta catalysts and their catalytic performance of propylene polymerization was investigated by comparing and correlating the catalyst structures and the polymerization characteristics. In the catalyst formation, the 1,3-diether had better affinity for the MgCl2 surface than the phthalate and the 1,3-diether generated the (110) surface more than the (104) surface while the phthalate generated both the (110) and (104) surfaces of MgCl2. With both donors introduced, the (110) and (104) surfaces were generated simultaneously, although the (110) surface was dominant due to the higher affinity via the 1,3-diether. In addition, it seemed probable that the active sites formed on the (110) plane showed isospecific characteristics in the presence of a donor while those formed on the (104) plane could be isospecific regardless of a donor. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 40536.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available