4.6 Article

Characterization of Poly(lactic acid) Multifilament Yarns. I. The Structure and Thermal Behavior

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 117, Issue 3, Pages 1516-1525

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.32046

Keywords

poly(lactic acid); structure; thermal behavior; differential scanning calorimetry; FTIR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structure and thermal behavior of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) multifilament yarns were studied by complementary techniques of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD). As for PLA filaments, notable differences in the WAXD patterns, DSC curves, and FTIR spectra were observed. The combination of the WAXD and FTIR results showed that PLA samples with different crystallinity contain alpha-form crystal structure. The FTIR spectra of the filaments were analyzed to study their crystallinity and crystal structure. The total crystallinity of the PLA filaments was obtained from the percent area loss of the skeletal amorphous band at 955 cm(-1). Crystalline fraction from FTIR and DSC were comparable with each other. The C=O stretching region, which is sensitive to crystallization and dipole-dipole interactions, was evaluated to provide information about chain conformers and crystallinity of the samples. Depending on the processing conditions, double melting peaks were observed in the DSC curves of the samples. This exhibited the structural reorganization of the crystal phase during heating affected by heating and cooling rate. In the DSC curves of the nearly amorphous multifilament yarn, the exothermic peak observed right above the glass transition temperature (T-g) indicated two relaxed and deformed amorphous regions. However, the multifilament yarn with higher crystallinity showed just endothermic melting peak after its glass transition. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 117: 1516-1525, 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available