4.5 Article

Comparison of single- or multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and spectroscopy for assessment of appendicular skeletal muscle in the elderly

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 115, Issue 6, Pages 812-818

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00010.2013

Keywords

bioelectrical impedance analysis; sarcopenia; muscle strength; elderly; skeletal muscle mass

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [23-333]
  2. JSPS [24240091]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25560339] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is used to assess skeletal muscle mass, although its application in the elderly has not been fully established. Several BIA modalities are available: single-frequency BIA (SFBIA), multifrequency BIA (MFBIA), and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS). The aim of this study was to examine the difference between SFBIA, MFBIA, and BIS for assessment of appendicular skeletal muscle strength in the elderly. A total of 405 elderly (74.2 +/- 5.0 yr) individuals were recruited. Grip strength and isometric knee extension strength were measured. Segmental SFBIA, MFBIA, and BIS were measured for the arms and upper legs. Bioelectrical impedance indexes were calculated by squared segment length divided by impedance (L-2/Z). Impedance at 5 and 50 kHz (Z(5) and Z(50)) was used for SFBIA. Impedance of the intracellular component was calculated from MFBIA (Z(250-5)) and BIS (RICW). Correlation coefficients between knee extension strength and L-2/Z(5), L-2/Z(50), L-2/RICW, and L-2/Z(250-5) of the upper legs were 0.661, 0.705, 0.790, and 0.808, respectively (P < 0.001). Correlation coefficients were significantly greater for MFBIA and BIS than SFBIA. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that L-2/Z(250-5) and L-2/RICW had significantly larger areas under the curve for the diagnosis of muscle weakness compared with L-2/Z(5) and L-2/Z(50). Very similar results were observed for grip strength. Our findings suggest that MFBIA and BIS are better methods than SFBIA for assessing skeletal muscle strength in the elderly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available