4.8 Article

Braiding of submarine channels controlled by aspect ratio similar to rivers

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages 700-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2505

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. St. Anthony Falls Laboratory Industry Consortium
  2. Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC)
  3. ConocoPhillips
  4. Chevron
  5. Shell
  6. ExxonMobil
  7. BHP Billiton
  8. Ministry of Science and Technology from Taiwan [MOST 103-2221-E-006-215]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The great majority of submarine channels formed by turbidity and density currents are meandering in planform; they consist of a single, sinuous channel that transports a turbid, dense flow of sediment from submarine canyons to ocean floor environments(1,2). Braided turbidite systems consisting of multiple, interconnected channel threads are conspicuously rare(1). Furthermore, such systems may not represent the spontaneous planform instability of true braiding, but instead result from erosive processes or bathymetric variability(3-5). In marked contrast to submarine environments, both meandering and braided planforms are common in fluvial systems(6,7). Here we present experiments of subaqueous channel formation conducted at two laboratory facilities. We find that density currents readily produce a braided planform for flow aspect ratios of depth to width that are similar to those that produce river braiding. Moreover, we find that stability model theory for river planform morphology(8) successfully describes submarine channels in both experiments and the field. On the basis of these observations, we propose that the rarity of braided submarine channels is explained by the generally greater flow depths in submarine systems, which necessitate commensurately greater widths to achieve the required aspect ratio, along with feedbacks(9,10) among flow thickness, suspended sediment concentration and channel relief that induce greater levee deposition rates and limit channel widening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available