4.5 Article

Fat oxidation rate and the exercise intensity that elicits maximal fat oxidation decreases with pubertal status in young male subjects

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages 742-748

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01256.2007

Keywords

adults; substrate utilization; indirect calorimetry; fat metabolism; cycling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The range of exercise intensities that elicit high fat oxidation rates (FOR) in youth and the influence of pubertal status on peak FOR are unknown. In a longitudinal design, we compared FOR over a range of exercise intensities in a small cohort of developing prepubertal male subjects. Five boys all at Tanner stage 1 (ages 11 - 12 yr) and nine men (ages 20 - 26 yr) underwent an incremental cycle ergometry test to volitional exhaustion. FOR curves were determined from indirect calorimetry during the final 30 s of each increment. The same protocol was duplicated annually in the boys as they progressed through puberty. The peak FOR was considerably higher (P < 0.05) in boys at Tanner 1 (8.6 +/- 1.5 mg.kg lean body mass(-1).min(-1)) (mean +/- SD) compared with men (4.2 +/- 1.1 mg.kg lean body mass(-1).min(-1)). FOR dropped as boys developed through puberty (Tanner 2/ 3 peak rate = 7.6 +/- 0.6 mg.kg lean body mass(-1).min(-1); Tanner 4 peak rate = 5.4 +/- 1.8 mg.kg lean body mass(-1).min(-1), main effect of Tanner stage; P < 0.05) to the levels found in men (not significant). The exercise intensity that elicited peak FOR was higher in the boys at Tanner 1 [56 +/- 6% peak aerobic power ((V) over dot(O2) peak)] than in men (31 +/- 4% (V) over dot(O2) peak) (P < 0.001). This value tended to decrease by Tanner stage 4 (45 +/- 10% (V) over dot(O2) peak, main effect of Tanner stage; P = 0.06). We conclude that, compared with men, prepubertal boys have higher relative FOR throughout a wide range of exercise intensities and that FOR drops as boys develop through puberty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available