4.8 Article

Highly branched and loop-rich gels via formation of metal-organic cages linked by polymers

Journal

NATURE CHEMISTRY
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 33-41

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCHEM.2390

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CHE-1334703, CHE-1351646]
  2. MIT Energy Initiative
  3. Deshpande Center for Technological Innovation
  4. National Institutes of Health [EB-002026]
  5. Department of Defense National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate program
  6. Intel
  7. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  8. Government of Canada
  9. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center program of the NSF [DMR-1419807]
  10. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [S10RR013886] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB003151, P41EB002026, R01EB001960] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gels formed via metal-ligand coordination typically have very low branch functionality, f, as they consist of similar to 2-3 polymer chains linked to single metal ions that serve as junctions. Thus, these materials are very soft and unable to withstand network defects such as dangling ends and loops. We report here a new class of gels assembled from polymeric ligands and metal-organic cages (MOCs) as junctions. The resulting 'polyMOC' gels are precisely tunable and may feature increased branch functionality. We show two examples of such polyMOCs: a gel with a low f based on a M2L4 paddlewheel cluster junction and a compositionally isomeric one of higher f based on a M12L24 cage. The latter features large shear moduli, but also a very large number of elastically inactive loop defects that we subsequently exchanged for functional ligands, with no impact on the gel's shear modulus. Such a ligand substitution is not possible in gels of low f, including the M2L4-based polyMOC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available