4.6 Article

Modeling combined coherent and incoherent scattering structures for light trapping in solar cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4813102

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Flemish IWT-SBO project SiLaSol [3E100243]
  2. Interuniversity Attraction Poles program of the Belgian Science Policy Office [IAP P7-35]
  3. SIM (Flemish Strategic Initiative for Materials)
  4. IWT (Flemish agency for Innovation by Science and Technology)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current structures for solar cells or LEDs often incorporate layers of various optical regimes, with a mixture of coherent, partially coherent or incoherent behavior. We developed a simple and efficient calculation method to study such combined solar cell structures with both wave and ray optics sections. These One-Pass Coherent calculations take wave effects into account where they matter the most, while avoiding a large computational domain to model rough structures. The method simulates a general diffuser by working directly with the reflected wavefronts, instead of using its geometry. We utilize this method to study thin film silicon solar cell structures with a grating on the front and a diffuser at the back. More absorption is obtained with the combined light trapping scheme of appropriate characteristics, compared with grating-only or diffuser-only counterparts. Finally, we report a significant effect of incoherence on the absorption of fairly thin (similar to 10 mu m) cells. We demonstrate that partially incoherent light can be more efficiently absorbed than fully coherent light on average over a broad wavelength range. It turns out that the scarcity of guided modes for fully coherent light can hinder the grating enhancement, leading to a consistently better performance when light coherence is limited or lost. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available