4.6 Article

Vibrational, elastic, and structural properties of cubic silicon carbide under pressure up to 75GPa: Implication for a primary pressure scale

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 113, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4795348

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation-Earth Sciences [EAR-0622171]
  2. Department of Energy-Geosciences [DE-FG02-94ER14466]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. NSF [EAR-0842057]
  5. Carnegie Institution of Washington
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [0842057] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Materials Research
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1126249] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present results of concomitant measurements of synchrotron x-ray diffraction (XRD), Brillouin, and Raman spectroscopy on the single crystal samples of cubic silicon carbide (3C-SiC) under quasi-hydrostatic pressures up to 65GPa, as well as x-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy up to 75GPa. We determined the equation of state of 3C-SiC and pressure dependencies of the zone-center phonon, elastic tensor, and mode Gruneisen parameters. Cubic SiC lattice was found to be stable up to 75GPa, but there is a tendency for destabilization above 40GPa, based on softening of a transverse sound velocity. By applying the concomitant density and elasticity measurements, we determined the pressure on the SiC sample without referring to any other pressure scale thus establishing a new primary pressure scale with a 2%-4% precision up to 65 GPa. We proposed corrections to the existing ruby and neon pressure scales, and also calibrated cubic SiC as a pressure marker for the x-ray diffraction and Raman experiments. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4795348]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available