4.8 Article

Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity

Journal

NATURE
Volume 520, Issue 7545, Pages 45-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nature14324

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/J011193/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F017324/1]
  3. TRY initiative on plant traits, whose database is maintained at Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
  4. DIVERSITAS
  5. IGBP
  6. Global Land Project
  7. NERC
  8. French Foundation for Biodiversity Research
  9. GIS 'Climat, Environnement et Societe' France
  10. NERC [NE/J011193/2, NE/J011193/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [982737] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J011193/2, NE/J011193/1, 1282072] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human activities, especially conversion and degradation of habitats, are causing global biodiversity declines. How local ecological assemblages are responding is less clear-a concern given their importance for many ecosystem functions and services. We analysed a terrestrial assemblage database of unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage to quantify local biodiversity responses to land use and related changes. Here we show that in the worst-affected habitats, these pressures reducewithin-sample species richness by anaverage of 76.5%, total abundance by 39.5% andrarefaction-based richness by 40.3%. We estimate that, globally, these pressures have already slightly reduced average within-sample richness (by 13.6%), total abundance (10.7%) and rarefaction-based richness (8.1%), with changes showing marked spatial variation. Rapid further losses are predicted under a business-as-usual land-use scenario; within-sample richness is projected to fall by a further 3.4% globally by 2100, with losses concentrated in biodiverse but economically poor countries. Strongmitigationcan delivermuchmore positive biodiversity changes (up to a 1.9% average increase) that are less strongly related to countries' socioeconomic status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available