4.8 Article

Decrease in CO2 efflux from northern hardwater lakes with increasing atmospheric warming

Journal

NATURE
Volume 519, Issue 7542, Pages 215-218

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nature14172

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSERC Canada
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  3. Province of Saskatchewan
  4. Canada Research Chair programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Boreal lakes are biogeochemical hotspots that alter carbon fluxes by sequestering particulate organic carbon in sediments(1,2) and by oxidizing terrestrial dissolved organic matter to carbon dioxide (CO2) or methane through microbial processes(3,4). At present, such dilute lakes release similar to 1.4 petagrams of carbon annually to the atmosphere(3,4), and this carbon efflux may increase in the future in response to elevated temperatures(5) and increased hydrological delivery of mineralizable dissolved organic matter to lakes(6,7). Much less is known about the potential effects of climate changes on carbon fluxes from carbonate-rich hardwater and saline lakes that account for about 20 per cent of inland water surface area(4,8). Here we show that atmospheric warming may reduce CO2 emissions from hardwater lakes. We analyse decadal records of meteorological variability, CO2 fluxes and water chemistry to investigate the processes affecting variations in pH and carbon exchange(9,10) in hydrologically diverse lakes of central North America. We find that the lakes have shifted progressively from being substantial CO2 sources in the mid-1990s to sequestering CO2 by 2010, with a steady increase in annual mean pH. We attribute the observed changes in pH and CO2 uptake to an atmospheric-warming induced decline in ice cover in spring that decreases CO2 accumulation under ice, increases spring and summer pH, and enhances the chemical uptake of CO2 in hardwater lakes. Our study suggests that rising temperatures do not invariably increase CO2 emissions from aquatic ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available