4.6 Article

Influence of plant polyphenols and medicinal plant extracts on antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages 192-199

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05322.x

Keywords

antibiotics; Escherichia coli; plant extracts; polyphenols

Funding

  1. Presidium of Russian Academy of Sciences
  2. Russian Fund of Basic Research RFBR-Ural [10-04-96017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To investigate the influence of polyphenols and plant extracts on the susceptibility of Escherichia coli to antibiotics. Methods and Results: Susceptibility of E.coli to antibiotics in the presence of extracts and polyphenols was estimated by the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). To study gene expression, we used strains of E.coli carrying fusions between promoters of genes katG, sodA, iucC and structural beta-galactosidase gene. Treatment with polyphenols and some plant extracts significantly decreased the antibacterial effects of antibiotics, to a larger extent, ciprofloxacin. The most remarkable protective effect was observed for the extracts of Chamerion (Epilobium) angustifolium, Filipendula vulgaris, Tanacetum vulgare and Serratula coronata. These extracts increased the MICs of ciprofloxacin by four and more times. In case of kanamycin, extracts of Artemisia austriaca and Artemisia pontica increased MICs by four and eight times, respectively. Polyphenol quercetin also caused protective effect against ciprofloxacin, increasing the MIC by four times. A positive correlation was found between protective effects of polyphenols and extracts and their antioxidant activity. Conclusion: Medicinal plant extracts and polyphenols may protect cells of E.coli against antibiotic toxicity. Significance and Impact of the Study: The results of this study may be used to enhance the efficiency of antibacterial therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available