4.6 Article

Characterization of the staphylococcal bacteriophage lysin CHAPK

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 1025-1035

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05119.x

Keywords

bacteriophage; CHAP(K); endolysin; LysK; lysostaphin; peptidase

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [06/RFP/BIM004]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [06/RFP/BIM004] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To develop an efficient purification strategy for the bacteriophage lysin CHAP(K). To evaluate its antibacterial spectrum, enzymatic properties, optimal reaction conditions and lytic activity against live Staphlyococcus aureus. Methods and Results: Recombinant CHAP(K) was purified to homogeneity by cation exchange chromatography, with yields of up to 10 mg from 11 of Escherichia coli culture. The lytic spectrum of CHAP(K) includes all staphylococcal species and also members of the genera Micrcococcus, Streptococcus, Nesterenkonia, Arthrobacter, Leuconostoc and Carnobacterium. The enzyme was active from pH 6 to 11 with an optimum activity at pH 9, from 5 to 40 degrees C, with an optimum activity at 15 degrees C. When cell lysis by CHAPK and lysostaphin was compared over a concentration range of 2.5-10 mu g ml(-1) using live Staph. aureus for 5 min at 37 degrees C, CHAP(K) gave rise to greater turbidity reduction indicating that it works more rapidly than lysostaphin. Conclusions: This study describes in detail the purification and characteristics of the novel phage-derived enzyme CHAP(K) demonstrating that it has excellent biochemical properties as an anti-staphylococcal agent. Significance and Impact of the Study: Currently, there is a need for new antimicrobial agents due to the increasing worldwide prevalence of antibiotic resistance. Our findings demonstrate the potential for development of CHAP(K) as an alternative therapeutic against pathogenic staphylococci including MRSA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available