4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Swimming performance and larval quality are altered by rearing substrate at early life phases in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson, 1836)

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ICHTHYOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 1461-1472

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jai.12642

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the role of substrate enrichment on larval growth and performance, white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus, were reared for 12dph (the pre-feeding stage) in the presence and absence of enriched substrates (i.e. structurally complex media). Following this period, larval sturgeon were transferred to holding tanks with unenriched substrate (lacking structural complexity) and reared for an additional 30days, during which time health and performance indicators (growth, U-crit, startle response reaction time) and whole body lipid composition were assessed at 15 and 18 degrees C. Sturgeon reared on unenriched substrates tended to grow more slowly (up to 40% reduced mass at 40dph) with a lower condition factor (5-15% lower between 8 and 40dph), but also exhibited delayed gut development and reduced rate of yolksac absorption (at 15dph) than those reared with enriched substrates. Whole body lipid composition was significantly altered with substrate enrichment, although the biological relevance of these changes is unknown. White sturgeon reared without exposure to enriched substrates at some temperatures and developmental phases demonstrated modest reductions in aerobic (similar to 20-30% lower U-crit) and startle response performance (similar to 5-10% slower reaction time) at 15 and 30dph. Overall, most effects were influenced by rearing temperatures and parentage, such that differences were not statistically significant under all conditions. Clearly, however, substrate enrichment plays an important role in development of white sturgeon during early life stages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available