4.2 Article

The efficacy of dusting honey bee colonies with powdered sugar to reduce varroa mite populations

Journal

JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 72-76

Publisher

INT BEE RESEARCH ASSOC
DOI: 10.3896/IBRA.1.48.1.14

Keywords

honey bee; varroa mite; powdered sugar dusting; integrated pest management

Categories

Funding

  1. Florida State Beekeepers Association
  2. Florida State Legislature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Controlling varroa mite (Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman) populations in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies with acaricides has been a challenge for beekeepers due to the rapid development of resistant mite populations. For this reason, many beekeepers are adopting Integrated Pest Management strategies as alternatives to chemocentric varroa control schemes. One non-chemical tool that has been used for varroa control is dusting bee colonies with powdered sugar. The objective of our study was to determine the efficacy of powdered sugar as a varroa control by comparing mite populations, adult bee populations, and brood area in untreated colonies with those in colonies dusted every two weeks for 11 months with 120 g powdered sugar per application. We found that dusting colonies with powdered sugar did not significantly affect the adult bee population (treated: 10061.72 +/- 629.42; control: 10691.00 +/- 554.44) or amount of brood (treated: 4521.91 +/- 342.84 cm(2); control: 4472.55 +/- 365.85 cm(2)). We also found no significant differences between the total number of mites per colony (treated: 2112.15 +/- 224.62; control: 2197.80 +/- 207.75), number of mites per adult bee (treated: 0.080 +/- 0.010; control: 0.097 +/- 0.010), or number of mites per capped brood cell (treated: 0.112 +/- 0.013; control: 0.106 +/- 0.018). All data are mean +/- s.e. Within the limits of our study and at the application rates used, we did not find that dusting colonies with powdered sugar afforded significant varroa control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available