4.7 Article

RAHN-2, a chromosomal extended-spectrum class A β-lactamase from Rahnella aquatilis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 65, Issue 8, Pages 1619-1623

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkq178

Keywords

phylogenetic diversity; Rahnella spp; antimicrobial resistance; environment; enterobacteria; class A ESBLs

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Fishery and Agriculture [AQS R02/03-921 E 162 RT20]
  2. CNR 'Resistance to antibiotics in commensal flora' [RMES 27]
  3. Hopital Bichat-Claude Bernard, APHP, Paris, France
  4. Institut National de la Veille Sanitaire (INVS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rahnella aquatilis is an environmental enterobacterial species with a chromosomal bla(RAHN-1) gene encoding extended-spectrum class A beta-lactamase RAHN-1. We describe the diversity of bla(RAHN) genes from two groups of strains, G1 and G2, isolated from raw fruits and vegetables, and the new class A beta-lactamase RAHN-2. MICs were determined by Etest. bla(RAHN) genes were amplified by PCR, sequenced, and cloned to produce RAHN-1 and RAHN-2 proteins whose kinetic parameters were determined. All strains had similar beta-lactam resistance patterns. However, isolates of G1 were at least 2-fold more susceptible to piperacillin, amoxicillin, piperacillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam and cefotaxime. Sequences of bla(RAHN) from G1 had < 82.9% identity with that of bla(RAHN-1), whereas those of G2 were > 92% identical. The RAHN-2 beta-lactamase was 89.8% identical to RAHN-1, 5-fold more efficient than RAHN-1 in hydrolysing ticarcillin and 2.5-fold more efficient in cefotaxime and cefuroxime hydrolysis. However, the specific activity of RAHN-1 was 2-fold higher than that of RAHN-2 suggesting that the bla(RAHN) genes are regulated differently. The new class A beta-lactamase RAHN-2 is phenotypically difficult to detect and requires MIC determination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available