4.7 Article

Simultaneous determination of Co, Fe, Ni and Pb in carbon nanotubes by means of solid sampling high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 657-665

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ja30377b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTQ2012-33494, CTQ2009-08606]
  2. Aragon Government (Fondo Social Europeo)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work explores the possibilities of solid sampling high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry for the direct analysis of carbon nanotubes. In particular, the simultaneous determination of Co, Fe, Ni and Pb is intended, as these elements are typically found in these samples as impurities. The results demonstrate that it is possible to find spectral (monitoring of the region between 283.168 and 283.481 nm), furnace (2500 degrees C for atomization; use of 100 ng Pd as a chemical modifier) and detector (use of side pixels to expand the linear range) conditions that permit the development of a fast and straightforward method for the simultaneous determination of the target elements at the levels at which they are typically found (mg g(-1) for Co, Fe and Ni; mu g g(-1) for Pb) in carbon nanotubes. Limits of detection of 23 pg (Pb), 6 ng (Fe), 65 ng (Ni) and 86 ng (Co) were obtained, which are suitable for this type of sample. In this way, it was feasible to carry out the analysis of the samples investigated (one candidate reference material and three commercially available samples) and achieve accurate results when constructing the calibration curve with aqueous standards. Precision values for 5 solid sample replicates varied between 7 and 15% RSD in most cases. Overall, the proposed method shows important benefits for the cost-effective analysis of such complex samples in routine labs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available