4.7 Article

Green upconversion luminescence in Yb3+/Er3+ co-doped ALn(MoO4)2 (A = Li, Na and K; Ln = La, Gd and Y)

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 540, Issue -, Pages 107-112

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.04.052

Keywords

Sol-gel synthesis; Luminescence

Funding

  1. high-level talent project of Northwest University
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2010CDB01607]
  3. Foundation of Shaanxi Educational Committee [11JK0528]
  4. Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Photoelectric Technology and Functional Materials (Culture Base) in Shaanxi Province
  5. Korea Research Foundation Grant
  6. Korean Government [2010-0022540]
  7. National Core Research Center Program from MEST
  8. NRF [2010-0001-226]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Yb3+ and Er3+ co-doped ALn(MoO4)(2) (A = Li, Na and K; Ln = La, Gd and Y) phosphors were synthesized by sol-gel method. The structures and the phase purities of the samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The shapes and size distribution of the phosphor particles were also investigated by the field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). The phosphors showed intense green emission peaked at 530 and 552 nm due to the H-2(11/2) -> I-4(15/2) and S-4(3/2) -> I-4(15/2) transitions of Er3+ under the excitation of a 980 nm laser diode. The dependences of their UC luminescence properties on the hosts, the concentration of the dopants and annealing temperature were investigated. The phosphor showed the brightest green emission as the concentration of Er3+ fixed at 0.5 mol% and the annealing temperature is 800 degrees C. In the range from 5 to 20 mol%, the more Yb3+ was doped, the more intense UC luminescence can be achieved. The UC excitation mechanism for green emission of Er3+ was also investigated based on the power dependence of UC luminescence intensity. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available