4.7 Article

Influences of cobalt substitution and size effects on magnetic properties of coprecipitated Co-Fe ferrite nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 509, Issue 19, Pages 5919-5925

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.050

Keywords

Spinel ferrite; Cobalt substitution; Nanoparticles; Magnetic properties; Superparamagnetic; Finite size effects

Funding

  1. Vietnam's National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [103.02.105.09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Co-substituted ferrite nanoparticles with narrow size distribution have been prepared by coprecipitation method. X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed that the samples have cubic spinel structure of which the lattice constant slightly decreases upon cobalt substitution. The mean crystallite size of the samples was in the range 9.5-11nm as deduced from the XRD line broadening. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) verified the presence of cobalt in the substituted samples. The morphology and size distribution of the nanoparticles were studied using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Magnetic properties were determined using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The samples are characterized by a superparamagnetic transition at blocking temperatures T(B) below room temperature. The coercivity H(c) at low temperatures follows a simple model of thermal activation of particle's moment over the anisotropy barrier in the temperature range below T(B) which is in accordance with Kneller's law for ferromagnetic materials. From the blocking temperature and from the thermal decay of the coercivity, the effective anisotropy constant values were determined to be in order of 10(6) erg/cm(3). The Curie temperature T(C) and saturation magnetization M(s) at nanoscale are lower than those of the bulk and decrease with the increase of cobalt content. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available