4.7 Article

High incidence of heparin-induced allergic delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions in pregnancy

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 132, Issue 1, Pages 131-139

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.02.047

Keywords

Heparin; low-molecular-weight heparin; delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction; pregnancy; heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; skin; allergy

Funding

  1. Department of Internal Medicine (Division of Vascular Medicine and Hemostaseology)
  2. Department of Dermatology
  3. Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  4. Excellence Cluster Inflammation at Interfaces [EXC 306/1]
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. Bayer
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim
  8. Sanofi-Aventis
  9. Biotest AG
  10. Biogen-Idec

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Among the most frequent adverse effects of subcutaneous heparin treatment, heparin-induced skin lesions occur with an incidence of 10.3% in nonpregnant female patients. Clinical observations suggest an even higher risk during pregnancy. Objectives: We sought to determine the incidence and causes of heparin-induced skin reactions during pregnancy in a prospective cohort study. Methods: Pregnant women with subcutaneous heparin treatment were prospectively examined for skin reactions. If a skin lesion was observed, further diagnostics were performed (skin biopsy, subcutaneous provocation, clinical/laboratory assessment for thrombosis, bleeding, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia [HIT]). Safety parameters were also analyzed (cross-allergies, frequency of thromboembolic and bleeding complications, HIT, and pregnancy outcome). Results: Among 111 pregnant patients, 22 (19.8%) had heparin-induced skin reactions (95% CI, 13% to 29%). All lesions were caused by allergic delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions and not by HIT or other rare conditions. The median time of onset was 50.5 days (range, 5-184 days). The cross-reactivity rate was 33.3%. While nadroparin treatment exhibited a higher DTH risk than dalteparin (hazard ratio [HR], 26.7; 95% CI, 3.4-211.0; P = .00187), enoxaparin treatment was not significantly different from dalteparin treatment (HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 0.3-96.1; P = .238). Three thromboembolic events and 1 major bleeding event occurred. Conclusions: Among patients receiving long-term heparin anticoagulation during pregnancy, heparin-induced skin lesions are frequent (incidence, 19.8%) and are all caused by allergic DTH reactions. Nadroparin has the highest frequency of skin lesions (approximately 65% at 100 days), which is significantly higher than that of dalteparin (HR, 26.7). Therefore nadroparin use should be avoided in pregnancy when possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available