4.7 Article

Comparison of Inhibitory Activities and Mechanisms of Five Mulberry Plant Bioactive Components against α-Glucosidase

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 61, Issue 34, Pages 8110-8119

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf4019323

Keywords

alpha-glucosidase; 1-deoxynojirimycin; resveratrol; oxyresveratrol; cyanidin-3-glucoside; cyanidin-3-rutinoside; interaction

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  2. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B505]
  3. National Special Fund for State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering [2060204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The a-glucosidase inhibitory effects of five bioactive components, namely I-deoxynojirimycin, cyanidin-3-glucoside, cyanidin-3-rutinoside, resveratrol and oxyresveratrol contained in mulberry (Morus, Moraceae) plants have been compared. Spectroscopy methods were employed to compare their alpha-glucosidase inhibitory mechanisms. The results revealed that 1-deoxynojirimycin (competitive), resveratrol and oxyresveratrol (noncompetitive) were stronger inhibitors than acarbose, while cyanidin-3-glucoside and cyanidin-3-rutinoside (mix competitive and noncompetitive) showed modest activities. IDeoxynojirimycin, resveratrol and oxyresveratrol could quench the fluorescence spectra statically by forming stable complexes, while the quenching of cyanidin-3-rutinoside and cyanidin-3-glucoside belonged to dynamic quenching by the collision of molecules. The interactions between ligands and alpha-glucosidase were mainly driven by hydrophobic force, or hydrogen bonding consequently induced conformational changes and reduced surface hydrophobicity. Docking results suggested that they could bind to alpha-glucosidase at different sites. This work provides useful information for the understanding of the ligands a-glucosidase interactions and identifies oxyresveratrol as a potent alpha-glucosidase inhibitor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available