4.7 Article

Influence of pH, Iron Source, and Fe/Ligand Ratio on Iron Speciation in Lignosulfonate Complexes Studied Using Mossbauer Spectroscopy. Implications on Their Fertilizer Properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 60, Issue 13, Pages 3331-3340

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf204913s

Keywords

iron; lignosulfonates; complexes; Mossbauer spectroscopy

Funding

  1. ERA [MCI-EUI 2009-04156, OTKA NN-84307]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Iron chlorosis is a very common nutritional disorder in plants that can be treated using iron fertilizers. Synthetic chelates have been used to correct this problem, but nowadays environmental concerns have enforced the search for new, more environmentally friendly ligands, such as lignosulfonates. In this paper, Fe coordination environment and speciation in lignosulfonate (LS) complexes prepared under different experimental conditions were studied by Fe-57 Mossbauer spectroscopy in relation to the Fe-complexing capacities, chemical characteristics of the different products, and efficiency to provide iron in agronomic conditions. It has been observed that the complex formation between iron and lignosulfonates involves different coordination sites. When Fe2+ is used to prepare the iron-LS product, complexes form weak adducts and are sensitive to oxidation, especially at neutral or alkaline pH. However, when Fe3+ is used to form the complexes, both Fe2+ and Fe3+ are found. Reductive sugars, normally present in lignosulfonates, favor a relatively high content of Fe2+ even in those complexes prepared using Fe3+. The formation of amorphous ferrihydrite is also possible. With respect to the agronomical relevance of the Fe2+/Fe3+ speciation provided by the Mossbauer spectra, it seems that the strong Fe3+-LS complexes are preferred when they are applied to the leaf, whereas root uptake in hydroponics could be more related with the presence of weak bonding sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available