4.7 Article

Phytochemicals and Dietary Fiber Components in Rye Varieties in the HEALTHGRAIN Diversity Screen

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 56, Issue 21, Pages 9758-9766

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf801065r

Keywords

Phytochemical; rye; Secale cereale L.; genetic variation; old genetic resources; dietary fiber; arabinoxylan; folate; tocopherol; tocotrienol; alkylresorcinol; phenolic acid; plant sterol

Funding

  1. European Commission [FP6-514008]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the United Kingdom
  3. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/00004976] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00004740, BBS/E/C/00004976] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ten rye varieties grown in one location were analyzed for their contents of dietary fiber (arabinoxylan and beta-glucan) and phytochemicals (folate, tocols, phenolic acids, alkylresorcinols, and sterols). The varieties included old and modern varieties from five European countries. Significant differences were observed in the contents of all phytochemicals in whole grains and in the fiber contents in the flour and bran. The old French varieties Haute Loire and Queyras had high contents of most phytochemicals, whereas the Polish varieties Dankowskie-Zlote and Warko were relatively poor in phytochemicals. The varieties with a high content of folate tended to have low alkylresorcinol contents and vice versa. Furthermore, high contents of arabinoxylans were associated with high contents in tocols and sterols. The 10 selected rye samples comprising old populations and old and modern varieties from different ecological regions of Europe demonstrate high natural variation in their composition and show that landraces and old populations are useful genetic resources for plant breeding. The contents of single phytochemicals can likely be affected by breeding, and they may be adjusted by the right selection of genotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available